By now, everyone even vaguely familiar with information security knows the
military maxim of blitzkrieg – burst through the hardened defense at a
single point and then rush pell-mell to the rear where the soft underbelly of
any static army lies. It is a good military strategy, provided you have the
resources to break through the defenses and follow up with a rapid advance
into the rear areas. While there are variants of this plan, and a lot of
discussion about how/when it is strategically worth the risk, historically
speaking it has been a smashing success. Germany did it to France and the Low
Countries in 1940, to Russia in 1941, Russia returned the favor in 1943, and
the western allies joined used it successfully at Normandy in late 1944.
Sherman’s March to the Sea in the American Civil War was just such a ploy
(though Sherman was more willing to hit civilian targ... (more)
There was an interesting discussion on one of the table-top wargame lists I
belong to (Two Hour Wargames if you follow the hobby) about the
“production value” of a given set of printed products. While it
devolved (as web conversations often seem to) to a comparison with Hollywood,
the point was valid. The original reviewer that caused the thread to get
started was more interested in how pretty the books were than the quality of
the contents. I, personally, don’t care how ugly or mal-produced a wargames
ruleset is if the rules are consistent and provide many hours of enjoyable ... (more)
There is a series of advertisements for Capital One aired in the US featuring
Vikings talking about “more points” from their credit cards that asks
“What’s in your wallet?” While they’re entertaining, I never
understood what Vikings had to do with a credit card, other than perhaps both
like to plunder unsuspecting innocents. Though in fairness, credit card
issuers tend to just increase rates, while the Vikings enjoyed wholesale
slaughter when they plundered, and took literally everything not nailed down.
The author, with Lori and a collection of friends
But the question is valid ... (more)
The complexities of life often escape a young child. The Little Man asked me
the other day why I had to go work, which was both a compliment to wanting to
spend time with me and an unintended backhand slap at Lori, who was going to
hang out with him while I took care of business. The answer was the usual
stuff, that working paid the bills, and work has its own rewards… It did
not include “and I like my job”, though I do, simply because I didn’t
want to imply “more than hanging out with you” to a three year old.
But children boil everything down to simplicity. The picture over ther... (more)
It is entertaining to read all that is currently being written about DevOps.
Having been a developer, a development manager, an operations manager, and
even a CTO, I can attest to the fact that the “throw it over the wall”
syndrome is real, and causes real problems for everyone involved. That is
about where my agreement with the current round of pundits ends. The thing is
that they talk like there is some fundamental technological reason why DevOps
isn’t happening. That’s just not true. For those a little behind in your
jargon, DevOps is making operations prevalent in the decisio... (more)